Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. De Geer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBait.ey, P. J.

This is an action of trespass on the case. The first count of the declaration alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of certain goods and chattels, and that the defendant, for the purpose of getting possession of the same, wrongfully and maliciously, and without probable cause therefor, shed out an attachment against the property of the plaintiff before a justice of the peace, falsely allegingthat she was a non-resident of the State, and caused said goods and chattels to be seized under said writ; that said attachment was quashed and determined in her favor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swingley v. HaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. McBean v. RitchieIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Forth v. PursleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Joliet & Chicago Railroad v. BarrowsIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luby v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Moran v. KlatzkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Klicka v. KlickaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. Flannigen v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Eldred v. RipleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API