Legal Opinion

Eldred v. Ripley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 24, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trespass oil the Case, for fraudulently and maliciously conspiring to depreciate the value of capital stock of a corporation. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in t\áp court at the March term, 1901.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment must be affirmed, because the declaration does not complain of Charles S. Ripley, but of one Josiah Stedman, who is not a party to the suit. The declaration - as amended commences as follows: “John E. Eldred, by Jerome Probst, his attorney, complains of Josiah Stedman of a plea of trespass on the case,” and then proceeds in regular form, setting out the allegations, the substance of which appears in the statement and is clearly subject to the cause of special demurrer assigned.

We have, however, seen fit to consider…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Greaves v. . GougeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Farwell v. Great Western Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zokoych v. SpaldingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Murphy v. CandorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API