Legal Opinion
Porter v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated July 11, 1994, as denied its motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
According to the plaintiff, he purchased two "brand new Uniroyal Tiger Paw steel belted radial tires” on September 16, 1988. About three weeks later, on October 7, 1988, one of these tires "blew out” as the plaintiff was driving his car in a funeral procession on the Belt Parkway in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coley v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Narciso v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Yager v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Johnson v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aghabi v. SebroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Brown v. BorrusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Graham v. Walter S. Pratt & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wallach v. American Home Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Smith v. AT&T Resource Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.