Legal Opinion

Yager v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a personal injury action based upon theories of negligence and breach of warranty, the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated October 14, 1982, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior order denying the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. Appellant’s motion for summary judgment in the third-party action, on the ground that respondent cannot prove the tire in question was defective, was properly denied. The third-party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Jackson v. MelveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Franklin National Bank v. De GiacomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Coley v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Otis v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Porter v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Putnick v. H.M.C. AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API