Commonwealth v. Manuszak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
These four appellants, together with Seiders who pleaded guilty and became a commonwealth witness, were indicted in a bill containing five counts charging them with setting up and maintaining a gambling place and enticing persons to gamble. Sections 605 and 606 of the Penal Code of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS 4605, 4606. Additional bills also charged that appellants “did unlawfully engage, in gambling for a livelihood.” Section 603, 18 PS 4603. They were found guilty of all charges. The appeals bring up for consideration the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ValloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. KarmendiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. CicconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Com. v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. ZotterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DarlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Commonwealth v. PalaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. LuccheseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. BetresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FaheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.