Legal Opinion
Fanale v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 17, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. 320 (1958)
139 A.2d 749
SALVATORE J. FANALE AND MARY K. FANALE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 20, 1958.
Decided March 17, 1958.
Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys; Mr. Ralph W. Chandless, of counsel).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.
The complaint attacked the validity of a supplement to a zoning ordinance. While the action…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Duffcon Concrete Products, Inc. v. Borough of CresskillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. Borough of MountainsideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Odabash v. MAYOR AND COUN. DUMONTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974