Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Ordek ConstruiNG Claims in Dispute; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
INTRODUCTION
At the heart of this patent action is an angioplasty device named “Chocolate.” *1280Defendant Eitan Konstantino, an inventor of angioplasty devices, worked for plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. (“AngioScore”), a company that makes and sells angioplasty devices. Later, he started his own company, TriReme Medical, Inc., which has since reorganized as defendant TriReme Medical, LLC (“TriReme”). TriReme makes…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Finjan, LLC. v. Cisco Systems Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020