Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1910No. 2892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Quitman— Judge McCall. April 20, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor, and excepts to tlie judgment overruling his motion for new- trial. In addition to the general grounds of the motion for a new trial, the movant filed in the court below an amendment containing several additional grounds. ‘

1. It appears from the record that the trial judge did not sign the formal order verifying the recitals of fact in the amendment and approving its several grounds. For this reason it is insisted by counsel for the defendant in error that the amended- grounds of the motion for a new trial can not be considered. This would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milton v. City of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Baird v. BateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Veal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Dixie-Ohio Express, Inc. v. BrackettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Rozier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API