Milton v. City of Savannah
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. February 12, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
No entry of approval appears on the brief of evidence, nor does the bill of exceptions recite that the brief of evidence was approved. It' appears from the record-that, after the bill of exceptions was certified and filed, the judge deposited in the clerk’s office a writing in which it was in effect stated that the brief of evidence was correct, and that his failure to indorse upon it an approval was an oversight. This court can not con-. sider a brief of evidence which has not been approved by the trial judge. See Cawthon v. State, 119 Ga. 395 (3). The approval of a brief of evidence may be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Minhinnett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Baird v. BateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Cobb v. DeLongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.