Legal Opinion
Cook v. Miller
California Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1917No. L. A. No. 4020PublishedCited by 17 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for damages to his person and to his property. The defendant’s motion for new trial was denied. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying the motion for new trial. The appeal was mistakenly taken to the district court of appeal of the second district, which court, discovering the mistake, transferred it" to this court.
The damages were caused by a collision between a motorcycle which plaintiff was riding and operating and an automobile driven by the defendant. It occurred in the city of Los Angeles at the intersection of Washington…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Cragg v. Los Angeles Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Irwin v. JudgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tieman v. Red Top Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Solko v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Traylen v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Morris v. Sierra & San Francisco Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.