Legal Opinion

Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1981No. 80-499Published

1Opinion of the Court

429 A.2d 1388 (1981)

Janice A. RZEPECKI, Petitioner,

v.

POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent.

No. 80-499.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted January 22, 1981.

Decided April 21, 1981.

Francis C. O'Brien and William Clague, Bethesda, Md., were on briefs, for petitioner.

Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, David P. Sutton, Acting Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., when the brief was filed, and Philip T. Van Zile, III, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Grosse Point Farms, Mich., were on brief, for respondent.

Before KELLY, HARRIS and FERREN, Associate Judges.

2Per curiam

Petitioner…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Whitehurst v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API