Legal Opinion
Galu v. Attias
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 1996No. 94 Civ. 8761 (JES)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, plaintiff Deborah Galu, acting pro se, brings the instant action against her former attorney Amy Attias, also acting pro se, asserting claims of legal malpractice and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of Attias’s representation of Galu on criminal charges. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), Attias moves for summary judgment. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(g), Galu cross-moves for summary judgment on the ground that Attias filed affidavits in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bryant v. SilvermanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Lemos v. PaterasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Arizona Hudson Valley LLC v. PietrzykowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Diandro Sena v. David Kowalski and Pacific Office Automation, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- Esposito v. GaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.