Legal Opinion

Diandro Sena v. David Kowalski and Pacific Office Automation, Inc.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided March 10, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00728Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DIANDRO SENA Plaintiff, v. No. 1:25-cv-00728-SMD-GBW DAVID KOWALSKI, and PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Doc. 5 (“Mot. to Remand”), filed August 4, 2025. Defendant Pacific Office Automation, Inc. (“Pacific”) filed its response on August 25, 2025. Doc. 11 (“Def.’s Resp.”). Plaintiff filed his reply on September 12, 2025. Doc. 17 (“Pl.’s Reply”). The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions, the record, and the relevant law, and for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Royal Canin U. S. A. v. WullschlegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  5. Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API