Legal Opinion

United States v. Chi Mak

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2012No. 08-50148PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Chi Mak (Mak) appeals his jury conviction of conspiring to violate export control laws and attempting to export a defense article to the People’s Republic of China, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), 22 U.S.C. § 2778, as implemented by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 C.F.R. §§ 120-30. Following his conviction, Mak moved for a new trial, challenging the Government’s failure to timely disclose its intended use of a particular expert witness, and claiming that the AECA is unconstitutionally vague. The district court denied…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. MikhelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Steven DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Defense Distributed v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Jose OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Pheerayuth BurdenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API