Walling v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 213(a) (3), provides an exemption for “any employee employed as a seaman The sole issue in the instant case was whether men employed on a dredge were “seamen.” Judge Barnes answered the quere in the negative. He predicated his conclusion on the ground's that (a) the Act is remedial and calls for a liberal construction and (b) the factual situation required it.
The facts were largely stipulated. They are:
“None of the defendant’s dredging employees are certificated as seamen by the United States Government; none have any United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helena Glendale Ferry Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Anderson v. Manhattan Lighterage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Gale v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Lowrimoore v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bean Dredging v. Alabama Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Walling v. W. D. Haden Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Sternberg Dredging Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Walling v. Keansburg Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.