Legal Opinion

Spotts v. Baltimore & OR Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 20, 1938No. 6635PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it in an action brought by plaintiff to recover for personal injuries and assigns error upon the action of the court in refusing its motion for a directed verdict. It insists also that the verdict is excessive; that the court erred in its instructions to the jury and that there is no substantial evidence to support a verdict.

The complaint charged that plaintiff was employed by defendant, an interstate carrier, as a brakeman; that at the time of the accident, defendant negligently failed to equip properly a certain car…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ScarlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Didinger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. AuchenbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Connie Strickland v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Myers v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  4. Keizor v. Sand Springs Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. James W. Richardson v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API