People v. Darling
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
In the case before us, the issuing Judge authorized a wiretap warrant for a telephone line at a stated residence, specifying the telephone number to be tapped. The telephone number, however, was changed before the investigator installed the wiretap. We hold that suppression of the evidence flowing from the wiretap is not required, notwithstanding the change in telephone number.
In August 1997, the Syracuse Police Department was investigating local drug trafficking. In an application for a wiretap warrant, the prosecutor presented evidence that defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. DeProsperoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- United States v. VasconcellosDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- People v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 2016
- In re NYP Holdings, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.