Legal Opinion
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., HCM Division v. Truseal USA, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 6, 2005No. Civil Action 04-5546 (JAP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PISANO, District Judge.
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, HCM Division (“Saint-Gobain” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint with this Court 1 on August 6, 2004, alleging that Truseal USA, Inc. (“Truseal”) and its owner and president Stephen Ronald Warbur-ton-Pitt (“Warburton-Pitt”) (collectively “Defendants”) infringed a patent owned by Saint-Gobain. Defendants separately filed answers but both raised defenses and counterclaims challenging the validity of the patent. Plaintiff, invoking the doctrine of assignor estoppel, now moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Extrusion Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- VRG Controls, LLC v. Valpres SRLDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019