Legal Opinion

Star Show Case Manufacturing Co. v. Friedman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1935No. Appeal, 40PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an action of replevin, for drug store fixtures. The intervening defendant appeals from the order and judgment of the court below, making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to intervening defendant’s counterclaim. The landlord is the intervening defendant.

The intervening defendant, on August 11, 1932, leased to the defendant, Samuel B. Friedman, a certain store building at 1800 Market Street, Philadelphia. On August 23, 1932, the defendant leased from the plaintiff certain fixtures, under a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Standard Repair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Lee-Strauss Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Bentz v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Valincenti v. Central Motors Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. In re Clover Drugs, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Foresman v. Brockerhoff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API