Legal Opinion

Foresman v. Brockerhoff

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County

Decided December 30, 1960No. 184Published

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, P. J.,

To plaintiffs’ replevin proceedings, defendant 'filed a counterbond. Subsequently, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging ownership of a bar and back bar and the refusal of defendant to permit the removal of the same from real estáte owned by defendant. Defendant filed an answer denying ownership in plaintiffs, and under the'héading of new matter averred a lease agreement between the parties which provided, in substance, that the lessees, who are plaintiffs herein, shall not have the right to ■remove their property unless they have discharged all of their obligations under the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Star Show Case Manufacturing Co. v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API