Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Fraternal Aid Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1915No. 19,510PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Sumner district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action to compel payment of one-half of a beneficiary certificate in a fraternal beneficiary association. Judgment was for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

The defendant association was incorporated in 1894. Prior to that time, it existed as a voluntary association of individuals. The plaintiff became a member of the association and the -holder of a certificate therein, in March, 1893. The certificate provides:

“That Mason H. Kirk, ... is entitled to participate in the Benefit Fund . . ., subject to all the conditions on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rockhold v. Canton Masonic Mutual Benevolent SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Supreme Lodge Knights v. VandiverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Modern Woodmen of America v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Miller v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Pilcher v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. of W.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Haner v. Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United WorkmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Dey v. Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API