Kirk v. Fraternal Aid Ass'n
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sumner district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
This is an action to compel payment of one-half of a beneficiary certificate in a fraternal beneficiary association. Judgment was for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
The defendant association was incorporated in 1894. Prior to that time, it existed as a voluntary association of individuals. The plaintiff became a member of the association and the -holder of a certificate therein, in March, 1893. The certificate provides:
“That Mason H. Kirk, ... is entitled to participate in the Benefit Fund . . ., subject to all the conditions on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rockhold v. Canton Masonic Mutual Benevolent SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Supreme Lodge Knights v. VandiverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Modern Woodmen of America v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Miller v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Pilcher v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. of W.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
- Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
- Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Haner v. Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United WorkmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Dey v. Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.