Legal Opinion

Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1925No. 4130PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITTRELL, Special C. J.

The facts upon which the original action was based- are so tersely and clearly stated ■ by the Court of Civil Appeals (vol. 254 S. W. 637) that we deem it unnecessary to restate them.

The plaintiff in the court below alleged every < fact necessary to support her case, and the case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts which showed issuance of the certificate, payment of assessments, membership in good standing until the death of the insured, and the only question to be decided is whether the recovery should be for $2,100, or for $1,493.

We are of the opinion that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Masonic Benevolent Ass'n v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Westerman v. Supreme Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. of W.Texas Supreme Court · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bond. & Ins. Co. v. Orkin Exterm. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldTexas Supreme Court · 1926

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API