Legal Opinion

Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. of W.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1925No. 4130PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Kittrell

Statement of the Case. The facts upon which the original action was based are so tersely and clearly stated by the Court of Civil Appeals (Vol. 254, S. W. R. 637) that we deem it unnecessary to re-state them.

The plaintiff in the Court below alleged every fact necessary to support her case, and the case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts which showed issuance - of the certificate, payment of assessments, membership in good standing until the death of the insured, and the only question to be decided is whether the recovery should be for Two thousand, One hundred Dollars ($2,100.00), or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. MimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Ericson v. Supreme Ruling, Fraternal Mystic CircleTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. BatteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Coleman v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bond. & Ins. Co. v. Orkin Exterm. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Texas Supreme Court · 1925

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API