Rausch v. Barrere
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from judicial district court, parish, of St. Tammany; James M. Thompson,. Judge. Actions by John P. Rausch and Herman Schultz against Joseph Barrere, which were consolidated. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
The plaintiffs in these cases, allege that the defendant was the owner of' a dog, which, to his knowledge, was addicted to killing sheep, and that on the 11th of February, 1901, the dog killed five lambs, belonging to the one of them and ten belonging- to the other; that the lambs were-worth $2.50 each; and that defendant is liable, by law, for ten times their value, together with certain expenses, including attorney’s fees. And they pray judgment accordingly.
The defendant excepts that the Acts Nos.. Ill of 1886 and 143 of 1900, under the first of which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- State v. de St. RomesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lee v. FoleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Grand Lodge of Louisiana v. Natchitoches LodgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Duval v. HarveySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Sholars v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.