Legal Opinion

Sholars v. Davis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1930No. 3590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Defendant was going from place to place and from house to house in the parish of Winn selling goods, using a motor vehicle to transport them. Not having paid a license, the tax collector brought proceedings against him by rule to show cause why he should not pay license as a peddler, under section 18, Act No. 205 of 1924, as amended by Acts No. 299 of 1926 and No. 241 of 1928.

*406The defense is a general denial, but is elaborated and specifically set out in paragraph 15-A of the answer, which reads as follows :

“Further answering plaintiff’s petition, respondent avers and says: That under the mode…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  3. Commonwealth v. FarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. State ex rel. Curtis v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Commonwealth v. ReidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Shreveport Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Huggett v. MontgomeryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Codifer v. Shell Petroleum CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. McNutt v. H. B. Hughes Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API