Sholars v. Davis
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
Defendant was going from place to place and from house to house in the parish of Winn selling goods, using a motor vehicle to transport them. Not having paid a license, the tax collector brought proceedings against him by rule to show cause why he should not pay license as a peddler, under section 18, Act No. 205 of 1924, as amended by Acts No. 299 of 1926 and No. 241 of 1928.
*406The defense is a general denial, but is elaborated and specifically set out in paragraph 15-A of the answer, which reads as follows :
“Further answering plaintiff’s petition, respondent avers and says: That under the mode…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crenshaw v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Commonwealth v. FarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- State ex rel. Curtis v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Commonwealth v. ReidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edwards v. Shreveport Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Huggett v. MontgomeryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Codifer v. Shell Petroleum CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- McNutt v. H. B. Hughes Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963