Legal Opinion
Cooney v. Moomaw
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided January 15, 1953No. Civ. 400PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, Chief Judge.
Federal jurisdiction in this action is founded upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332. Damages for loss of consortium resulting from a negligent injury to her husband are sought by a wife, plaintiff herein, against two defendants, one the owner and the other the operator of a truck involved in a collision with a vehicle operated by plaintiff’s husband. Plaintiff’s husband has been fully compensated for his injury. Cooney v. Moomaw, 1 et al., Case No. 356, United States District Court, District of Nebraska, North Platte Division. Defendants have filed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Yoder v. Nu-Enamel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.