Izard County v. Bank of Melbourne
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Izard. Circuit Court; Z. M. Horton, Special Judge; 1. The court erred in refusing a trial by jury. Const. Art. 2, § 7, 4 Ark. 158; 8 Id. 436; 56 Id. 391; 75 Id. 443; 109 Id. 536; Const. Art. 7, § 33; Kirby’s Digest, § 1492; 32 Ark. 552; 73 Id. 462; 26 Fed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Izard. Circuit Court; Z. M. Horton, Special Judge; 1. The court erred in refusing a trial by jury. Const. Art. 2, § 7, 4 Ark. 158; 8 Id. 436; 56 Id. 391; 75 Id. 443; 109 Id. 536; Const. Art. 7, § 33; Kirby’s Digest, § 1492; 32 Ark. 552; 73 Id. 462; 26 Fed. Cases, 1024, 1030. 2. The trial court erred in its findings of fact, for the orders.and judgments of the county court were conclusive and unimpeachable in this proceeding. 96 Ark. 433; 60 Id. 155; 27 Id. 202; 10 Id. 241; 92 Id. 299; 87 Id. 438; 93 Id. 237. 3. There was no appropriation for waterworks. Kirby’s Digest, § 1502; 54…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
The county court of Izard County made an order, pursuant to terms of the statute, calling in the warrants of the county for re-issuance or cancellation, and the Bank of Melbourne in response to the call presented certain warrants which it held as owner. Four of the warrants, aggregating the sum of $800, had been issued by the county court to M. F. Hill, and four others, aggregating the sum of $151, had been issued by the county court to P. C. Sherrill, who was county judge at the time the warrants were issued but who had been succeeded by the present incumbent who made the order calling in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Monroe County v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Sadler v. CravenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Izard County v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. State Ex Rel. Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Bell v. ConnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928