Legal Opinion

Martin v. State Ex Rel. Saline County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). We deem it unnecessary to make an abstract of the evidence. While the testimony of A. Y. Martin flatly contradicts that of John F. Kirkpatrick, county judge of Saline County, to the effect that the agreement found by the chancellor, was made, still the testimony of Kirkpatrick was corroborated by that of other witnesses, and we think that it cannot be said that the finding of the chancellor was against. the preponderance of the evidence. Leach v. Smith, 130 Ark. 465, 197 S. W. 1160.

It may be then taken as settled, in so far as this opinion is concerned,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Leach v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Herman v. SchlesingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Monroe County v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Polk County v. Mena Star Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Kitchens v. ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. Luter v. Pulaski County Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Md. v. CowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API