Legal Opinion

Ledgerwood v. Pitts

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1909PublishedCited by 44 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. — John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The fundamental question presented on this record is in respect of the constitutionality of chapter 102 of the Acts of 1909, popularly known as the “Primary Election Law.” The bill was exhibited by complainants, as citizens and taxpayers of the State, against the members of the State Democratic and Republican *576boards of primary election commissioners, for the purpose of enjoining defendant commissioners from exercising their functions and having their salaries and expenses incurred by them in the execution of the act paid out of the funds of the State, on the ground that the act creating said…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Breckon v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State ex rel. Lamar v. DillonSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Zent v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1908

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kelso v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Baer v. GoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API