Legal Opinion

United States v. Heinz G. Dall

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1990No. 90-1049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Heinz G. Dali appeals pro se the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he entered a plea of guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the customs laws and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and one count of unlawful importation of 50 kilograms of chloramphenicol, an animal drug, into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 545, 2. Dali was sentenced to concurrent terms of 24 months’ imprisonment followed by three years’ supervised release, a $100 special assessment, and a $40,000 fine. We affirm.

Dali argues on appeal that (1)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Joseph E. LangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Billy MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Gary Benjamin WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Brent Joseph JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heinz G. Dall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Cephus Donald Dyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Brian WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. William ChippasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Electrodyne Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API