Legal Opinion
Velasquez v. Chamberlain
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 2009No. S-08-0043, S-08-0044PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] These two consolidated appeals arise from a dispute between neighboring landowners. The Chamberlains own certain water rights. Traditionally, the water had been carried to their property through an established ditch running through property currently owned by the Velasquezes. Prior to the Velasquezes' purchase of the property, the ditch failed, and the Chamberlains replaced it with a pipeline, running on a different course from the ditch. When the Velas-quezes bought the property, they claimed the Chamberlains had not received proper permission to install or maintain the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herbert Construction Company, Cross-Appellant v. Continental Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Rennard v. VollmarWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joyce Halling and Medcon Inc., a Utah corporation v. David A. Yovanovich and Ornella Dalla BonaWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. W.N. McMurry Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Rick Miller, Appointed Wrongful Death Representative for the Estate of Julia Faye Miller v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., a Foreign Corporation and Casper Operations, Llc, a Foreign Llc, D/B/A Life Care Center of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Stuart Goforth v. Jamey FifieldWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Knight v. TCB CONST. AND DESIGN, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.