Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McLean

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 31, 1989No. 2209PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Following a conviction by a trial jury for rape and false imprisonment and concurrent sentences of four to ten years and six months, to one year incarceration respectively, appellant now asks us to vacate his sentence and order a new trial. We take up the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred when it (a) precluded questions concerning the relationship between appellant and victim, when it (b) charged the jury on the requisites for common-law marriage, and when it (c) opined as to the sufficiency of some of the evidence; (2) whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Beswick v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PlattDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Marino v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API