Legal Opinion
Marino v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motions for summary judgment in their entirety.
Plaintiff’s claims for pecuniary loss sustained as a result of decedent’s death depend on proof of a common-law marriage in either Texas or Pennsylvania. Supreme Court correctly dismissed those causes of action based on a common-law marriage in Texas; however, the court erred in refusing to dismiss those causes of action based on a common-law marriage in the State of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Claim of Mott v. Duncan Petroleum Trans.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rosetta v. RosettaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Gary v. GaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- In Re the Estate of KovalchickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Potter v. DavieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Sears v. SearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999