Legal Opinion

Heinel v. Peoples Railway Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 26, 1907No. Action on the case No. 176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received on the twenty-third day of March, 1906, by being run into by one of the cars of the defendant company while the plaintiff was standing by the hind wheel of a furniture wagon which he was helping to load with furniture in front of his residence, No. 213 West Second Street in the City of Wilmington.

1Opinion of the Court

See further facts in the charge of the Court.

Lore, C. J.,

charging the jury:

Gentlemen of the jury:—William F. Heinel the plaintiff complains, that on the twenty-third day of March,1906, he was standing by the hind wheel of a furniture wagon which he was helping to load with furniture,in front of his residence No. 213 West Second Street, between West and Tatnall Streets in this City. That while so standing, conversing with the driver about loading the furniture with his back toward the approaching car from the west, he was negligently run into and thrown down by a trolley car operated by the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Brown v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
  3. Fleming v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Gismondi v. Peoples Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1911
  5. McGowan v. Wilmington & Philadelphia Traction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API