Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The first contention of defendant is: “His Honor erred in refusing to instruct the jury that if they found the facts to be as testified to by the witnesses and as disclosed by the evidence, they should answer the first issue in the negative, as requested by the defendants’ first prayer for instructions; and also in refusing to instruct the jury that if they found the facts to be as testified to by the witnesses and as disclosed by the evidence, they should answer the second issue in the affirmative as requested by the defendants’ second prayer for instructions.” We think the court below…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heinel v. Peoples Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keller v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Norman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Keller v. Caldwell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Matthews v. Blackwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API