Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 2007No. G037638PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Plaintiff Scott P. Holcomb challenges the judgment entered after the trial court sustained demurrers to each of his claims against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), and Dan Viles, a Wells Fargo vice-president and branch manager. Holcomb contends he properly alleged causes of action for negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, and negligence. Wells Fargo contends Holcomb’s claims fail because (a) Wells Fargo had an absolute right to charge back a provisional credit it had given to Holcomb on a $10,000 check when the payor bank dishonored the check; (b)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mitsui Manufacturers Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Copesky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Stearn v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- AVANTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. ShupakMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FSI, Financial Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.