Legal Opinion

Peuse v. Malkuch

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1996No. 95-388PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erdmann

This is an appeal from a decision of the Seventh Judicial District Court, Dawson County, granting partial summary judgment in favor of respondent Randy Peuse, and denying appellants James R. Malkuch and Betty Malkuch’s motion for reconsideration of summary judgment order and motion for leave to amend answer. We affirm.

The issues on appeal are as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in granting Peuse’s motion for partial summary judgment?

2. Did the District Court err in denying the Malkuchs the opportunity to amend their answer?

FACTS

In March 1990 Peuse and the Malkuchs entered into an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lindey's Inc. v. Professional Consultants, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Spain-Morrow Ranch, Inc. v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kearns v. McIntyre Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Johnston v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Allison v. Town of Clyde ParkMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Winslow v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API