Legal Opinion
Winslow v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 2000No. 99-483PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶ 1 Gary Winslow (Winslow) appeals from the First Judicial District Court’s Memorandum and Order dismissing Counts I, II and III of Winslow’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and granting summary judgment to Montana Rail Link (MRL) on Count IV seeking punitive damages. Winslow also appeals the District Court’s denial of his motion to amend his complaint and asks this Court to rule on an unresolved discovery issue. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Background
¶2 Winslow began working for MRL in 1987. Prior to working for MRL, he was employed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- Federated Mutual Insurance v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Hilands Golf Club v. AshmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Winslow v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
- Favel v. American Renovation & Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
- Abraham v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Haux v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
- Scott Wolfe v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.