Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Bank of Chelsea

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County. — Hon. Willard P. Hall, Judge.'

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action for conversion of corporate stock of the admitted value of $2000. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury. At the close of all the evidence the court declared the law to be “that plaintiff is entitled to recover the reasonable value of the stock at the time of conversion, November 5, 1919, with six per cent interest from that date.” There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $217,0 .and defendant has appealed.

The facts show that on August 14, 1918, plaintiff at Miami, Oklahoma, executed a promissory note in the sum of $1062.50…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  3. Hanover National Bank of New York v. SuddathSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. First National Bank v. City National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Rutledge v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caneer v. KentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Empire Gas Corp. v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Stuber v. HarlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Stephenson v. JobesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API