Ames v. Port Huron Log Driving & Booming Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair Circuit. The case is sufficiently -stated in the opinion of Justice Campbell.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J. :
The facts material to the decision of this case are briefly as follows: Plaintiffs bring suit to recover for certain logs purchased by them of the Black River Steam Mill Company. That company had let out to certain parties a contract for cutting, hauling, running and delivering the logs at their boom at or near the mouth .of the Black River. The defendants, who were organized in due form under Chapter 66 of the Compiled Laws, assumed to exercise their functions over the main portion of the river over which these logs were to be floated. The contractors referred to did not make…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moore v. SanborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Clute v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Dwight v. BlackmarMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
- Ames v. Port Huron Log Driving & Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- McDonald v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Gilchrist v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.