Smith v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*792“The court has discretion to determine what, if any, visitation is in the best interests of the child” (Matter of Franklin v Richey, 57 AD3d 663, 664 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Mera v Rodriguez, 73 AD3d 1069 [2010]). “This determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a substantial . . . basis in the record” (Matter of Franklin v Richey, 57 AD3d at 664 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Wispe v Leandry, 63 AD3d 853 [2009]; Matter of Thompson v Yu-Thompson, 41 AD3d 487, 488 [2007]). “While it is true that a parent’s incarceration does not, by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. Yu-ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Flood v. FloodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Conklin v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Mera v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Franklin v. RicheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ruple v. HarkenreaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rambali v. RambaliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cardona v. VantasselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Myers v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Burgess v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.