Legal Opinion

Ruple v. Harkenreader

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 2012PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarry, J.

The parties are the parents of a child (born in 2008). Petitioner (hereinafter the father) was incarcerated shortly before the child was born and is serving a prison term of 31/2 to 7 years. A 2008 order awarded sole custody to respondent (here*1086inafter the mother) and provided the father with visitation as the parties might agree. In 2011, the father commenced three modification proceedings, seeking initially to compel the mother to permit and pay for his telephone contact with the child, and subsequently making additional requests including scheduled visits with the child at the prison.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Flood v. FloodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Lane v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Conklin v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Cole v. ComfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Smith v. Dawn F.B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gelling v. McNabbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Rulinsky v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. LaRussa v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Matter of Lapham v. SenecalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Matter of Dharamshot v. SuritaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API