Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Puc

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 26, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The petitioner, alleging status as a creditor of the decedent, seeks an order compelling the administratrix to file her account (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, §§ 259, 211). The administratrix denied that the petitioner was a creditor or had any status to compel an accounting. The matter was placed upon the calendar for hearing, at which both sides offered evidence. It appears, without any dispute or any claim of surprise, that the alleged claim belonged to the petitioner’s deceased husband and that she is prosecuting it as his personal representative. The arguments advanced by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of SegallNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re the Compulsory Accounting of EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. In re the Estate of ScheftelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of AhrensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. In re the Accounting of EngelbachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RobinsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  2. In re the Estate of ThomsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API