In re the Compulsory Accounting of Eisenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
An allegation in a petition, in a proceeding such as this, that the petitioner is a creditor of the estate, does not in and of itself suffice to establish the petitioner’s right to maintain the proceeding as a creditor. The status of a “ creditor ” is not the same as that of a “person interested in the estate.” (Cf. Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 314, subds. 3, 10; see Matter of Leahy, 184 Misc. 250.) The learned Surrogate should have conducted a hearing and determined, upon evidence there adduced, whether the petitioner was a creditor prima facie. (Matter of Scheftel, 150 Misc. 3; see Matter of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Estate of ScheftelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of AhrensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- In re the Estate of LeahyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Accounting of EngelbachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Accounting of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of PucNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of ThomsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Accounting of LukinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.