Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Scheftel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Petitioner asserts a status as creditor of deceased because of an alleged balance unpaid upon shares of its stock. Respondent executors deny such creditor status and resist this compulsory accounting proceeding on the score that petitioner is not a person interested in the estate. In these circumstances the court has not only the right but the duty to make preliminary inquiry into the status of petitioner. (Matter of Comins, 9 App. Div. 492.)

In the trial of the narrow issue so before the court considerable proof has been taken and counsel have briefed in extenso various…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of St. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. In re Estate of CominsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of VernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Compulsory Accounting of EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In re the Accounting of EngelbachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  4. In re the Accounting of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  5. In re the Estate of PucNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API