Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Discipline of Gubbins

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1986No. C3-85-61Published

1DissentKelley, Justice

Because I’m convinced the continual conduct of respondent in the mishandling of his law office financial affairs merits a long period of suspension, if, indeed, not an out and out disbarment, I dissent.

While it is true that none of respondent’s clients sustained any financial losses as the result of his cavalier handling of their funds, the fact undisputedly remains that those funds were at risk for long periods of time. This court has not hesitated to indefinitely suspend nor to disbar merely because clients have not sustained financial loss from improper mishandling of their funds. See,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Matter of Discipline of RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against QuelloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API