Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 25, 2002No. 01-1398-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. Glover Jones was tried before a jury and convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of a controlled substance without the required tax stamps. Jones raises the following challenges: (1) evidence should have been suppressed because a search warrant affidavit failed to establish probable cause and contained purposefully false information; (2) the drug tax stamp law is unconstitutional because it violates the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against compelled self-incrimination; (3) the application of the drug tax stamp law in this case violates…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. RomeroWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. Ten Mile Investments, LLC v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  5. In Re Commitment of BuddCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API