Legal Opinion

Harris v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 29, 1977No. 76-5663PublishedCited by 598 opinions

1Per curiam

A clerk in a Tulsa, Okla., grocery store was shot and killed by a companion of petitioner in the course of a robbery of the store by the two men. Petitioner was convicted of felony-murder in Oklahoma State court. The opinion of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in this case states that “[i]n a felony murder case, the proof of the underlying felony [here robbery with firearms] is needed to prove the intent necessary for a felony murder conviction.” 555 P. 2d 76, 80-81 (1976). Petitioner nevertheless was thereafter brought to trial and convicted on a separate information charging the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

3Cited by598 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

593 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API