Legal Opinion

Slater v. Cauffiel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1946No. Appeals, 98 and 99PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Samuel Hammer, appellant in Appeal No. 98, and R. W. Lohr, appellant in Appeal No. 99, filed tbeir respective petitions in the court below pursuant to the provisions of the Act of 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. 672, to set aside extra-county service upon them, made pursuant to an order of court in conformity with Equity Rule 27. Alfred Slater, receiver of Kennerly Coal and Coke Company, appellee, filed a Bill in Equity against numerous defendants, two of whom are appellants, praying that a mortgage upon land forming a part of the assets of the company be foreclosed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mid-City Bank & Trust Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Gallagher, Admr. v. RoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Sullivan v. AlgremCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Franklin National Bank v. Kennerly Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Tenth National Bank v. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winters v. Rimersburg Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API