Legal Opinion
The Temple Bar
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 29, 1942No. 2426PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a proceeding for exemption from liability combined with a proceeding for limitation of liability, brought pursuant to the provisions of 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 183-188, by the Temple Steamship Company, Ltd., a British company, owner of the British steamship Temple Bar. The owner was originally sued in this Court by the Continental Insurance Company, the insurer of a cargo of approximately 7,000 tons of scrap iron shipped by Japanese charterers on this vessel which was lost when the vessel stranded on the coast of the State of Washington on April 8, 1939. The insurance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The G. R. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Farr v. Hain S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Wessel, Duval & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- American Tobacco Company v. GoulandrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Continental Ins. v. Temple Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. the Walter RaleighDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. SorianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.